在许多州，法律允许狗在主人承担责任之前有“第一口”的豁免权，即所谓的“One Bite Rule”。但在加州，由邓洪律师（Daniel Deng）领军的邓洪律师事务所郑重提醒圣盖博谷（SGV）的华人群体：加州实行的是“严格责任制”。 这里没有“第一次犯错免费”的说法。

什么是《民事法典》第 3342 条下的“严格责任”？

根据加州 《民事法典》第 3342 条，只要狗咬了人，主人就必须承担赔偿责任。法律并不在乎这只狗以前是否乖巧，也不在乎主人是否知道狗有攻击性。

在 2026 年，受害者只需证明以下三点即可获赔：

被告是该犬只的所有人。

咬伤发生在公共场所，或受害者合法停留的私人领地（如应邀作客）。

咬伤导致了实际伤害。

“咬伤”与“其他伤害”的区别

这是一个常见的法律误区：并不是所有由狗引起的伤害都属于“严格责任”。

咬伤： 即便牙齿没有刺破皮肤，只要有“咬”的行为，就触发严格责任。

其他伤害： 如果狗只是把你扑倒、绊倒或抓伤（没有咬），案件将按“普通疏忽”处理。在这种情况下，受害者必须证明主人没有尽到看管责任，或者明知狗有危险倾向。

法律抗辩：什么时候主人可以不赔？

虽然法律偏向受害者，但主人在以下情况仍可进行“无畏的辩护”：

非法入侵（Trespassing）： 如果受害者是未经允许私自闯入私人领地的（如小偷），严格责任不适用。

挑衅行为（Provocation）： 如果受害者踢打、戏弄或折磨狗，导致狗反击，赔偿额可能会大幅削减甚至取消。

职业风险承担： 兽医或宠物店员工在工作中被咬，通常被视为已预见并承担了风险。

邓洪律师事务所：您的正义坚盾

我们提供“无畏的辩护”。我们深知犬只伤人案件往往涉及邻里关系，处理起来需要极高的智慧和同理心。

母语服务： 我们用您的母语解析复杂的《民事法典》，确保沟通无碍。

精准取证： 无论是索要高额的医疗和整容费用，还是保护宠物主人的合法权益，我们都是您通往公正审判的坚实桥梁。

“为社区争取公正”意味着让法律保护每一个人。如果您遭遇犬只袭击，请立即联系邓洪律师。

In many states, a dog is famously allowed "one free bite" before the owner is held legally responsible. This common-law doctrine assumes an owner cannot be liable unless they had prior knowledge of their pet's aggressive tendencies. However, at Deng Law Center, led by community advocate Daniel Deng, we remind the San Gabriel Valley: California is a Strict Liability state. Under our laws, there is no "first bite" pass. If your dog bites someone, you are likely liable from the very first second of the very first incident.

What is "Strict Liability" Under Civil Code § 3342?

California Civil Code § 3342 creates a powerful "Shield" for victims. It dictates that a dog owner is liable for damages suffered by any person who is bitten, regardless of the dog’s former "viciousness" or the owner's knowledge of such tendencies.

To win a case in 2026, a victim only needs to prove:

The defendant owned the dog.

The bite occurred in a public place or while the victim was lawfully on private property.

The bite caused an injury.

The "Bite" Requirement vs. Other Injuries

It is a common misconception that any dog-related injury falls under strict liability. Civil Code § 3342 applies specifically to bites. * The Bite: Even if the skin is not punctured, a "grab" with the teeth can trigger strict liability.

Other Injuries: If a dog jumps on you, knocks you down, or scratches you without biting, the case proceeds under General Negligence. In these scenarios, the victim must prove the owner failed to exercise reasonable care or knew the dog was dangerous.

Lawful Presence and Common Defenses

While the law is heavily weighted toward the victim, owners do have a "Fearless Defense" in specific scenarios:

Trespassing: If the victim was on private property without an invitation or legal duty (like a burglar), strict liability does not apply.

Provocation: If the victim was hitting, teasing, or tormenting the dog, a jury may reduce or eliminate the owner’s liability.

Professional Assumption of Risk: Under the "Veterinarian’s Rule," professionals like vet techs or kennel workers may be barred from suing if they are bitten while performing their job duties.

Why Choose Deng Law Center?

We are "Protective & Bold." We understand that dog bite cases often involve neighbors or even friends, making them emotionally complex. We speak your language and act as your bridge to a fair trial. Whether you are seeking compensation for medical bills and scarring or defending your rights as a responsible pet owner, we ensure that "Justice for the community" is upheld with integrity.

Legal Disclaimer: Information provided is for educational purposes and does not constitute an attorney-client relationship. Military and police dogs performing official duties are generally exempt from strict liability under § 3342(b).